Canada vs Spain: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal

Canada
0 Unspecified
in 2026
Spain
0 Unspecified
in 2026
Canada rank
9th
Spain rank
9th

Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal over time

  • Canada
  • Spain
00.20.40.60.81195619912026

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0 Unspecified against 0 Unspecified in Spain, a difference of 0 Unspecified.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Spain ahead.

Canada ranks 9th and Spain ranks 9th of 30 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Spain Difference Ahead
1980s 0 Unspecified 0 Unspecified 0 Unspecified —
1990s 0.4 Unspecified 0.3 Unspecified 0.1 Unspecified Canada
2000s 0.2 Unspecified 0.3 Unspecified 0.1 Unspecified Spain
2010s 0.1 Unspecified 0.4 Unspecified 0.3 Unspecified Spain
2020s 0.5714 Unspecified 0.2857 Unspecified 0.2857 Unspecified Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal, Canada or Spain?
Canada, at 0 Unspecified against 0 Unspecified in Spain as of 2026.
What is the difference in sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal between Canada and Spain?
0 Unspecified, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Spain?
40 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2026.
How do Canada and Spain rank globally for sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal?
Canada ranks 9th and Spain ranks 9th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Spain: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sahm-rule-recession-indicator-recession-signal/canada/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sahm-rule-recession-indicator-recession-signal/canada/spain/">Canada vs Spain: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal
Unit
Unspecified
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 1,260 data points, 1955–2026
Last refreshed

The Sahm rule is a simple recession indicator based on increases in the unemployment rate. Originally developed for the United States, it is triggered when the three-month average unemployment rate rises by at least 0.5 percentage points above its lowest level in the previous year. To assess its usefulness beyond the United States, the OECD has calculated the Sahm indicator for OECD countries using monthly unemployment rates from the OECD Labour Force Surveys and replaced the fixed U.S. threshold with country-specific thresholds. Under this approach, the indicator is triggered when the three-month average unemployment rate rises above its country-specific threshold relative to its lowest level in the previous year. For more information please refer to Can we predict recessions using only unemployment data? Applying the Sahm rule to OECD countries.