Lithuania vs Tonga: People not using safely managed sanitation facilities
Lithuania
103,026 people
in 2024
Tonga
71,624 people
in 2024
Lithuania rank
128th
Tonga rank
131st
People not using safely managed sanitation facilities over time
- Lithuania
- Tonga
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 103,026 people against 71,624 people in Tonga, a difference of 31,402 people.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times Tonga's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 128th and Tonga ranks 131st of 150 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 534,044 people | 64,194 people | 469,851 people | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 278,678 people | 66,834 people | 211,843 people | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 119,704 people | 71,489 people | 48,215 people | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed sanitation facilities, Lithuania or Tonga?
- Lithuania, at 103,026 people against 71,624 people in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed sanitation facilities between Lithuania and Tonga?
- 31,402 people, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tonga?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Tonga rank globally for people not using safely managed sanitation facilities?
- Lithuania ranks 128th and Tonga ranks 131st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed sanitation services might practice open defecation, use unimproved sanitation facilities, or use improved facilities that do not safely manage human waste.