Bhutan vs Comoros: People not using safely managed sanitation facilities
Bhutan
399,869 people
in 2024
Comoros
438,900 people
in 2024
Bhutan rank
112th
Comoros rank
111th
People not using safely managed sanitation facilities over time
- Bhutan
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 438,900 people against 399,869 people in Bhutan, a difference of 39,031 people.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 112th and Comoros ranks 111th of 150 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 378,432 people | 411,751 people | 33,319 people | Comoros |
| 2010s | 391,291 people | 426,356 people | 35,064 people | Comoros |
| 2020s | 400,660 people | 436,495 people | 35,835 people | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using safely managed sanitation facilities, Bhutan or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 438,900 people against 399,869 people in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using safely managed sanitation facilities between Bhutan and Comoros?
- 39,031 people, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Comoros?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Comoros rank globally for people not using safely managed sanitation facilities?
- Bhutan ranks 112th and Comoros ranks 111th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using safely managed sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
People not using safely managed sanitation services might practice open defecation, use unimproved sanitation facilities, or use improved facilities that do not safely manage human waste.