Mexico vs Sri Lanka: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Mexico
0 people
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 people
in 2024
Mexico rank
141st
Sri Lanka rank
141st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Mexico
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 141st and Sri Lanka ranks 141st of 175 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.97 million people | 1.72 million people | 6.25 million people | Mexico |
| 2010s | 3.67 million people | 773,176 people | 2.89 million people | Mexico |
| 2020s | 499,753 people | 55,171 people | 444,581 people | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
- Mexico, at 0 people against 0 people in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 0 people, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Mexico ranks 141st and Sri Lanka ranks 141st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.