Luxembourg vs Thailand: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Luxembourg
12.57 people
in 2024
Thailand
0 people
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
138th
Thailand rank
141st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Luxembourg
- Thailand
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 12.57 people against 0 people in Thailand, a difference of 12.57 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Thailand ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 138th and Thailand ranks 141st of 175 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.92 people | 935,753 people | 935,677 people | Thailand |
| 2010s | 39.81 people | 396,995 people | 396,956 people | Thailand |
| 2020s | 18.03 people | 64,308 people | 64,290 people | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Luxembourg or Thailand?
- Luxembourg, at 12.57 people against 0 people in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Luxembourg and Thailand?
- 12.57 people, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Thailand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Thailand rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Luxembourg ranks 138th and Thailand ranks 141st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.