Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Kyrgyzstan
0 people
in 2024
Uruguay
0 people
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
141st
Uruguay rank
141st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Uruguay, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 141st of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 128,197 people | 23,450 people | 104,747 people | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 48,690 people | 8,084 people | 40,606 people | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0 people | 559.77 people | 559.77 people | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0 people against 0 people in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 0 people, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 141st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.