Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities

Kiribati
29,694 people
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
30,379 people
in 2024
Kiribati rank
103rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
102nd

People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time

  • Kiribati
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0k40.0k60.0k200020122024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 30,379 people against 29,694 people in Kiribati, a difference of 685 people.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 103rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 102nd of 175 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 40,512 people 50,711 people 10,198 people Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 35,388 people 38,723 people 3,335 people Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 30,162 people 30,955 people 793.28 people Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Kiribati or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 30,379 people against 29,694 people in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
685 people, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
Kiribati ranks 103rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 102nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rural-without-improved-sanitation/kiribati/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rural-without-improved-sanitation/kiribati/sao-tome-and-principe/">Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Unit
people
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 4,269 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.