Guyana vs Turkmenistan: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Guyana
0 people
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 people
in 2024
Guyana rank
141st
Turkmenistan rank
141st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Guyana
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 141st and Turkmenistan ranks 141st of 175 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74,896 people | 51,586 people | 23,310 people | Guyana |
| 2010s | 32,348 people | 24,186 people | 8,162 people | Guyana |
| 2020s | 2,606 people | 677.94 people | 1,929 people | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Guyana or Turkmenistan?
- Guyana, at 0 people against 0 people in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Guyana and Turkmenistan?
- 0 people, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Turkmenistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Turkmenistan rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Guyana ranks 141st and Turkmenistan ranks 141st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.