Czechia vs Falkland Islands: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Czechia
0 people
in 2024
Falkland Islands
0 people
in 2024
Czechia rank
141st
Falkland Islands rank
141st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Czechia
- Falkland Islands
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Falkland Islands, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 141st and Falkland Islands ranks 141st of 175 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Falkland Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,142 people | 0 people | 17,142 people | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1,858 people | 0 people | 1,858 people | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0 people | 0 people | 0 people | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Czechia or Falkland Islands?
- Czechia, at 0 people against 0 people in Falkland Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Czechia and Falkland Islands?
- 0 people, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Falkland Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Falkland Islands rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Czechia ranks 141st and Falkland Islands ranks 141st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.