Cyprus vs Israel: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Cyprus
4,849 people
in 2024
Israel
7,502 people
in 2024
Cyprus rank
124th
Israel rank
122nd
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Cyprus
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 7,502 people against 4,849 people in Cyprus, a difference of 2,653 people.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.5 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 124th and Israel ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,701 people | 0 people | 1,701 people | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 3,283 people | 2,370 people | 913.42 people | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 4,610 people | 6,749 people | 2,139 people | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Cyprus or Israel?
- Israel, at 7,502 people against 4,849 people in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Cyprus and Israel?
- 2,653 people, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Israel?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Israel rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Cyprus ranks 124th and Israel ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.