Chile vs Luxembourg: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Chile
0 people
in 2024
Luxembourg
12.57 people
in 2024
Chile rank
141st
Luxembourg rank
138th
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Chile
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 12.57 people against 0 people in Chile, a difference of 12.57 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 141st and Luxembourg ranks 138th of 175 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 477,217 people | 75.92 people | 477,141 people | Chile |
| 2010s | 191,386 people | 39.81 people | 191,346 people | Chile |
| 2020s | 15,946 people | 18.03 people | 15,928 people | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Chile or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 12.57 people against 0 people in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Chile and Luxembourg?
- 12.57 people, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Luxembourg rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Chile ranks 141st and Luxembourg ranks 138th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.