Brazil vs South Sudan: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Brazil
8.17 million people
in 2024
South Sudan
8.11 million people
in 2024
Brazil rank
19th
South Sudan rank
21st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Brazil
- South Sudan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 8.17 million people against 8.11 million people in South Sudan, a difference of 59,380 people.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 21st of 175 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.52 million people | 7.77 million people | 4.75 million people | Brazil |
| 2020s | 9.09 million people | 7.70 million people | 1.40 million people | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Brazil or South Sudan?
- Brazil, at 8.17 million people against 8.11 million people in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Brazil and South Sudan?
- 59,380 people, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and South Sudan rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Brazil ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 21st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.