Armenia vs Comoros: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Armenia
154,504 people
in 2024
Comoros
171,732 people
in 2024
Armenia rank
81st
Comoros rank
78th
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Armenia
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 171,732 people against 154,504 people in Armenia, a difference of 17,228 people.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 81st and Comoros ranks 78th of 175 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 196,253 people | 295,201 people | 98,948 people | Comoros |
| 2010s | 173,866 people | 249,022 people | 75,156 people | Comoros |
| 2020s | 156,620 people | 191,122 people | 34,503 people | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Armenia or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 171,732 people against 154,504 people in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Armenia and Comoros?
- 17,228 people, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Comoros?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Comoros rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Armenia ranks 81st and Comoros ranks 78th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.