Argentina vs Lesotho: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Argentina
719,188 people
in 2016
Lesotho
654,622 people
in 2024
Argentina rank
62nd
Lesotho rank
65th
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Argentina
- Lesotho
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 719,188 people against 654,622 people in Lesotho, a difference of 64,566 people.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 62nd and Lesotho ranks 65th of 175 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 963,194 people | 1.21 million people | 250,813 people | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 739,867 people | 942,725 people | 202,858 people | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Argentina or Lesotho?
- Argentina, at 719,188 people against 654,622 people in Lesotho as of 2016.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Argentina and Lesotho?
- 64,566 people, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Lesotho?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Argentina and Lesotho rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Argentina ranks 62nd and Lesotho ranks 65th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.