Australia vs Peru: Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees
Australia
0.1288
in 2015
Peru
0.0971
in 2021
Australia rank
55th
Peru rank
57th
Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.1288 against 0.0971 in Peru, a difference of 0.0317.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Peru ahead.
Australia ranks 55th and Peru ranks 57th of 63 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.112 | 0.1284 | 0.0164 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.1252 | 0.105 | 0.0202 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 0.1288 against 0.0971 in Peru as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of public paid employees between Australia and Peru?
- 0.0317, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for rural residents, as a share of public paid employees?
- Australia ranks 55th and Peru ranks 57th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.