Australia vs Mexico: Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees
Australia
0.1288
in 2015
Mexico
0.0972
in 2019
Australia rank
55th
Mexico rank
56th
Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees over time
- Australia
- Mexico
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.1288 against 0.0972 in Mexico, a difference of 0.0316.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Australia ranks 55th and Mexico ranks 56th of 63 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1123 | 0.0956 | 0.0167 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.1252 | 0.1028 | 0.0224 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, Australia or Mexico?
- Australia, at 0.1288 against 0.0972 in Mexico as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of public paid employees between Australia and Mexico?
- 0.0316, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for rural residents, as a share of public paid employees?
- Australia ranks 55th and Mexico ranks 56th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.