Peru vs South Africa: Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation
Peru
0.121
in 2016
South Africa
0.1338
in 2020
Peru rank
13th
South Africa rank
12th
Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.1338 against 0.121 in Peru, a difference of 0.0128.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 12th of 24 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0869 | 0.1274 | 0.0405 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.059 | 0.1598 | 0.1008 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.1338 against 0.121 in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0128, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation?
- Peru ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 12th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.