Australia vs Peru: Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation
Australia
0.1115
in 2015
Peru
0.121
in 2016
Australia rank
14th
Peru rank
13th
Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.121 against 0.1115 in Australia, a difference of 0.0095.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 14th and Peru ranks 13th of 24 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1308 | 0.0334 | 0.0974 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.1256 | 0.0306 | 0.095 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation, Australia or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.121 against 0.1115 in Australia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation between Australia and Peru?
- 0.0095, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation?
- Australia ranks 14th and Peru ranks 13th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.