Australia vs Peru: Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry
Australia
0.1157
in 2015
Peru
0.1087
in 2015
Australia rank
17th
Peru rank
18th
Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.1157 against 0.1087 in Peru, a difference of 0.007.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Peru ahead.
Australia ranks 17th and Peru ranks 18th of 25 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1034 | 0.1286 | 0.0252 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.1038 | 0.1256 | 0.0218 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 0.1157 against 0.1087 in Peru as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry between Australia and Peru?
- 0.007, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry?
- Australia ranks 17th and Peru ranks 18th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry: Public Administration. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.