Australia vs Guatemala: Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry
Australia
0.1416
in 2015
Guatemala
0.13
in 2017
Australia rank
12th
Guatemala rank
14th
Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.1416 against 0.13 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0116.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 12th and Guatemala ranks 14th of 25 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1084 | 0.2579 | 0.1495 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.1271 | 0.1382 | 0.0111 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry, Australia or Guatemala?
- Australia, at 0.1416 against 0.13 in Guatemala as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry between Australia and Guatemala?
- 0.0116, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry?
- Australia ranks 12th and Guatemala ranks 14th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of public paid employees, by industry: Health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.