Panama vs South Africa: Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees
Panama
0.2162
in 2021
South Africa
0.2222
in 2020
Panama rank
40th
South Africa rank
39th
Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees over time
- Panama
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.2222 against 0.2162 in Panama, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 40th and South Africa ranks 39th of 63 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2552 | 0.2518 | 0.0034 | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.2153 | 0.2169 | 0.0016 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of private paid employees, Panama or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.2222 against 0.2162 in Panama as of 2020.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of private paid employees between Panama and South Africa?
- 0.006, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Panama and South Africa rank globally for rural residents, as a share of private paid employees?
- Panama ranks 40th and South Africa ranks 39th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.