Australia vs United States of America: Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees
Australia
0.1417
in 2015
United States of America
0.1501
in 2018
Australia rank
54th
United States of America rank
52nd
Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees over time
- Australia
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 0.1501 against 0.1417 in Australia, a difference of 0.0084.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 54th and United States of America ranks 52nd of 63 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of private paid employees, Australia or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 0.1501 against 0.1417 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of private paid employees between Australia and United States of America?
- 0.0084, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United States of America?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Australia and United States of America rank globally for rural residents, as a share of private paid employees?
- Australia ranks 54th and United States of America ranks 52nd of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.