Australia vs Mexico: Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees
Australia
0.1417
in 2015
Mexico
0.1197
in 2019
Australia rank
54th
Mexico rank
57th
Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees over time
- Australia
- Mexico
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.1417 against 0.1197 in Mexico, a difference of 0.022.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Australia ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 57th of 63 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1067 | 0.1317 | 0.0251 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.1261 | 0.1312 | 0.0051 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural residents, as a share of private paid employees, Australia or Mexico?
- Australia, at 0.1417 against 0.1197 in Mexico as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural residents, as a share of private paid employees between Australia and Mexico?
- 0.022, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for rural residents, as a share of private paid employees?
- Australia ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 57th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Rural residents, as a share of private paid employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.