Nigeria vs Zimbabwe: Rule of Law

Nigeria
0.1282 standard error
in 2011
Zimbabwe
0.1282 standard error
in 2011
Nigeria rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Rule of Law over time

  • Nigeria
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.150.2199620032011

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.1282 standard error against 0.1282 standard error in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2099 standard error 0.1981 standard error 0.0118 standard error Nigeria
2000s 0.1517 standard error 0.1517 standard error 0 standard error Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1309 standard error 0.1309 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Nigeria or Zimbabwe?
Nigeria, at 0.1282 standard error against 0.1282 standard error in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Nigeria and Zimbabwe?
0 standard error, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Nigeria and Zimbabwe rank globally for rule of law?
Nigeria ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.