Mauritania vs Namibia: Rule of Law
Mauritania
0.1328 standard error
in 2011
Namibia
0.132 standard error
in 2011
Mauritania rank
30th
Namibia rank
32nd
Rule of Law over time
- Mauritania
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.1328 standard error against 0.132 standard error in Namibia, a difference of 0.0008 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3067 standard error | 0.2099 standard error | 0.0969 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.1986 standard error | 0.1586 standard error | 0.04 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.1361 standard error | 0.1347 standard error | 0.0014 standard error | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law, Mauritania or Namibia?
- Mauritania, at 0.1328 standard error against 0.132 standard error in Namibia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in rule of law between Mauritania and Namibia?
- 0.0008 standard error, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for rule of law?
- Mauritania ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.