Malawi vs Togo: Rule of Law

Malawi
0.1366 standard error
in 2011
Togo
0.1366 standard error
in 2011
Malawi rank
25th
Togo rank
22nd

Rule of Law over time

  • Malawi
  • Togo
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Togo currently reports 0.1366 standard error against 0.1366 standard error in Malawi, a difference of 0 standard error.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 25th and Togo ranks 22nd of 53 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2099 standard error 0.2999 standard error 0.09 standard error Togo
2000s 0.1589 standard error 0.1929 standard error 0.0341 standard error Togo
2010s 0.1392 standard error 0.1398 standard error 0.0006 standard error Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Malawi or Togo?
Togo, at 0.1366 standard error against 0.1366 standard error in Malawi as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Malawi and Togo?
0 standard error, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Togo?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Malawi and Togo rank globally for rule of law?
Malawi ranks 25th and Togo ranks 22nd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.