Liberia vs Rwanda: Rule of Law

Liberia
0.1406 standard error
in 2011
Rwanda
0.1411 standard error
in 2011
Liberia rank
19th
Rwanda rank
18th

Rule of Law over time

  • Liberia
  • Rwanda
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1411 standard error against 0.1406 standard error in Liberia, a difference of 0.0005 standard error.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Rwanda ahead.

Liberia ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3096 standard error 0.3067 standard error 0.0029 standard error Liberia
2000s 0.2336 standard error 0.1972 standard error 0.0364 standard error Liberia
2010s 0.1435 standard error 0.1442 standard error 0.0006 standard error Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Liberia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.1411 standard error against 0.1406 standard error in Liberia as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Liberia and Rwanda?
0.0005 standard error, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Rwanda?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Liberia and Rwanda rank globally for rule of law?
Liberia ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.