Gambia vs Libya: Rule of Law

Gambia
0.1443 standard error
in 2011
Libya
0.1468 standard error
in 2011
Gambia rank
13th
Libya rank
10th

Rule of Law over time

  • Gambia
  • Libya
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.1468 standard error against 0.1443 standard error in Gambia, a difference of 0.0025 standard error.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 13th and Libya ranks 10th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2873 standard error 0.2158 standard error 0.0715 standard error Gambia
2000s 0.1879 standard error 0.1852 standard error 0.0027 standard error Gambia
2010s 0.1472 standard error 0.1483 standard error 0.0011 standard error Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Gambia or Libya?
Libya, at 0.1468 standard error against 0.1443 standard error in Gambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Gambia and Libya?
0.0025 standard error, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Libya?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Gambia and Libya rank globally for rule of law?
Gambia ranks 13th and Libya ranks 10th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.