Ethiopia vs Mali: Rule of Law

Ethiopia
0.13 standard error
in 2011
Mali
0.129 standard error
in 2011
Ethiopia rank
38th
Mali rank
41st

Rule of Law over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Mali
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Mali, a difference of 0.001 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mali ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 38th and Mali ranks 41st of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Mali Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2099 standard error 0.2873 standard error 0.0774 standard error Mali
2000s 0.158 standard error 0.1795 standard error 0.0215 standard error Mali
2010s 0.133 standard error 0.1319 standard error 0.0011 standard error Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Ethiopia or Mali?
Ethiopia, at 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Mali as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Ethiopia and Mali?
0.001 standard error, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mali?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Ethiopia and Mali rank globally for rule of law?
Ethiopia ranks 38th and Mali ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.