Eswatini vs Lesotho: Rule of Law

Eswatini
0.1443 standard error
in 2011
Lesotho
0.1424 standard error
in 2011
Eswatini rank
14th
Lesotho rank
17th

Rule of Law over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lesotho
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1443 standard error against 0.1424 standard error in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0019 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.

Eswatini ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 17th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3067 standard error 0.3128 standard error 0.0061 standard error Lesotho
2000s 0.2038 standard error 0.1916 standard error 0.0123 standard error Eswatini
2010s 0.1476 standard error 0.1451 standard error 0.0026 standard error Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Eswatini or Lesotho?
Eswatini, at 0.1443 standard error against 0.1424 standard error in Lesotho as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Eswatini and Lesotho?
0.0019 standard error, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lesotho?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and Lesotho rank globally for rule of law?
Eswatini ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 17th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.