Eswatini vs Gambia: Rule of Law

Eswatini
0.1443 standard error
in 2011
Gambia
0.1443 standard error
in 2011
Eswatini rank
14th
Gambia rank
13th

Rule of Law over time

  • Eswatini
  • Gambia
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.1443 standard error against 0.1443 standard error in Eswatini, a difference of 0 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 14th and Gambia ranks 13th of 53 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3067 standard error 0.2873 standard error 0.0194 standard error Eswatini
2000s 0.2038 standard error 0.1879 standard error 0.0159 standard error Eswatini
2010s 0.1476 standard error 0.1472 standard error 0.0004 standard error Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Eswatini or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.1443 standard error against 0.1443 standard error in Eswatini as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Eswatini and Gambia?
0 standard error, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for rule of law?
Eswatini ranks 14th and Gambia ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.