Equatorial Guinea vs Somalia: Rule of Law

Equatorial Guinea
0.152 standard error
in 2011
Somalia
0.1827 standard error
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
6th
Somalia rank
3rd

Rule of Law over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Somalia
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.1827 standard error against 0.152 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0307 standard error.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th and Somalia ranks 3rd of 53 countries.

Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Somalia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2212 standard error 0.3349 standard error 0.1138 standard error Somalia
2000s 0.1799 standard error 0.2607 standard error 0.0808 standard error Somalia
2010s 0.1554 standard error 0.1871 standard error 0.0317 standard error Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Equatorial Guinea or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.1827 standard error against 0.152 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Equatorial Guinea and Somalia?
0.0307 standard error, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Somalia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Somalia rank globally for rule of law?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th and Somalia ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.