Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Rule of Law

Equatorial Guinea
0.152 standard error
in 2011
Eritrea
0.1471 standard error
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
6th
Eritrea rank
8th

Rule of Law over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.152 standard error against 0.1471 standard error in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0049 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eritrea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th and Eritrea ranks 8th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2212 standard error 0.3345 standard error 0.1133 standard error Eritrea
2000s 0.1799 standard error 0.2143 standard error 0.0344 standard error Eritrea
2010s 0.1554 standard error 0.1508 standard error 0.0046 standard error Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.152 standard error against 0.1471 standard error in Eritrea as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
0.0049 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for rule of law?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th and Eritrea ranks 8th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.