Egypt vs Mozambique: Rule of Law

Egypt
0.13 standard error
in 2011
Mozambique
0.129 standard error
in 2011
Egypt rank
38th
Mozambique rank
41st

Rule of Law over time

  • Egypt
  • Mozambique
00.050.10.150.2199620032011

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Mozambique, a difference of 0.001 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mozambique ahead.

Egypt ranks 38th and Mozambique ranks 41st of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1981 standard error 0.2099 standard error 0.0118 standard error Mozambique
2000s 0.1559 standard error 0.154 standard error 0.0019 standard error Egypt
2010s 0.133 standard error 0.1319 standard error 0.0011 standard error Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Egypt or Mozambique?
Egypt, at 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Mozambique as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Egypt and Mozambique?
0.001 standard error, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mozambique?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Egypt and Mozambique rank globally for rule of law?
Egypt ranks 38th and Mozambique ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.