Egypt, Arab Rep. vs Madagascar: Rule of Law

Egypt, Arab Rep.
0.13 standard error
in 2011
Madagascar
0.129 standard error
in 2011
Egypt, Arab Rep. rank
38th
Madagascar rank
41st

Rule of Law over time

  • Egypt, Arab Rep.
  • Madagascar
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Egypt, Arab Rep. currently reports 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Madagascar, a difference of 0.001 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.

Egypt, Arab Rep. ranks 38th and Madagascar ranks 41st of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt, Arab Rep. averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt, Arab Rep. Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1981 standard error 0.2873 standard error 0.0892 standard error Madagascar
2000s 0.1559 standard error 0.1768 standard error 0.0209 standard error Madagascar
2010s 0.133 standard error 0.1319 standard error 0.0011 standard error Egypt, Arab Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Egypt, Arab Rep. or Madagascar?
Egypt, Arab Rep., at 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Madagascar as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Egypt, Arab Rep. and Madagascar?
0.001 standard error, with Egypt, Arab Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Rep. and Madagascar?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Egypt, Arab Rep. and Madagascar rank globally for rule of law?
Egypt, Arab Rep. ranks 38th and Madagascar ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.