Djibouti vs Sao Tome and Principe: Rule of Law
Rule of Law over time
- Djibouti
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.1529 standard error against 0.1517 standard error in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0012 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Djibouti ranks 7th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3067 standard error | 0.3345 standard error | 0.0278 standard error | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 0.2161 standard error | 0.2233 standard error | 0.0072 standard error | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 0.1551 standard error | 0.1562 standard error | 0.0011 standard error | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law, Djibouti or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.1529 standard error against 0.1517 standard error in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in rule of law between Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.0012 standard error, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for rule of law?
- Djibouti ranks 7th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 5th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.