Djibouti vs Eritrea: Rule of Law

Djibouti
0.1517 standard error
in 2011
Eritrea
0.1471 standard error
in 2011
Djibouti rank
7th
Eritrea rank
8th

Rule of Law over time

  • Djibouti
  • Eritrea
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 0.1517 standard error against 0.1471 standard error in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0046 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eritrea ahead.

Djibouti ranks 7th and Eritrea ranks 8th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3067 standard error 0.3345 standard error 0.0278 standard error Eritrea
2000s 0.2161 standard error 0.2143 standard error 0.0018 standard error Djibouti
2010s 0.1551 standard error 0.1508 standard error 0.0043 standard error Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Djibouti or Eritrea?
Djibouti, at 0.1517 standard error against 0.1471 standard error in Eritrea as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Djibouti and Eritrea?
0.0046 standard error, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eritrea?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Djibouti and Eritrea rank globally for rule of law?
Djibouti ranks 7th and Eritrea ranks 8th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.