Comoros vs Somalia: Rule of Law

Comoros
0.1905 standard error
in 2011
Somalia
0.1827 standard error
in 2011
Comoros rank
1st
Somalia rank
3rd

Rule of Law over time

  • Comoros
  • Somalia
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.1905 standard error against 0.1827 standard error in Somalia, a difference of 0.0078 standard error.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 1st and Somalia ranks 3rd of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Somalia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3345 standard error 0.3349 standard error 0.0005 standard error Somalia
2000s 0.2404 standard error 0.2607 standard error 0.0202 standard error Somalia
2010s 0.1915 standard error 0.1871 standard error 0.0043 standard error Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Comoros or Somalia?
Comoros, at 0.1905 standard error against 0.1827 standard error in Somalia as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Comoros and Somalia?
0.0078 standard error, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Somalia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Comoros and Somalia rank globally for rule of law?
Comoros ranks 1st and Somalia ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.