Comoros vs Guinea-Bissau: Rule of Law
Comoros
0.1905 standard error
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
0.1855 standard error
in 2011
Comoros rank
1st
Guinea-Bissau rank
2nd
Rule of Law over time
- Comoros
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.1905 standard error against 0.1855 standard error in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.005 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 1st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd of 53 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3345 standard error | 0.3052 standard error | 0.0293 standard error | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2404 standard error | 0.2132 standard error | 0.0273 standard error | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.1915 standard error | 0.1865 standard error | 0.005 standard error | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law, Comoros or Guinea-Bissau?
- Comoros, at 0.1905 standard error against 0.1855 standard error in Guinea-Bissau as of 2011.
- What is the difference in rule of law between Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.005 standard error, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for rule of law?
- Comoros ranks 1st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.