Central African Republic vs Lesotho: Rule of Law
Rule of Law over time
- Central African Republic
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.1424 standard error against 0.1387 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0037 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 20th and Lesotho ranks 17th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3345 standard error | 0.3128 standard error | 0.0217 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.2128 standard error | 0.1916 standard error | 0.0212 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1421 standard error | 0.1451 standard error | 0.003 standard error | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law, Central African Republic or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 0.1424 standard error against 0.1387 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in rule of law between Central African Republic and Lesotho?
- 0.0037 standard error, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Lesotho?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Lesotho rank globally for rule of law?
- Central African Republic ranks 20th and Lesotho ranks 17th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.