Central African Republic vs Congo: Rule of Law
Rule of Law over time
- Central African Republic
- Congo
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.1387 standard error against 0.1366 standard error in Congo, a difference of 0.0021 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 20th and Congo ranks 22nd of 53 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3345 standard error | 0.2873 standard error | 0.0472 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.2128 standard error | 0.1924 standard error | 0.0204 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1421 standard error | 0.1398 standard error | 0.0023 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law, Central African Republic or Congo?
- Central African Republic, at 0.1387 standard error against 0.1366 standard error in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in rule of law between Central African Republic and Congo?
- 0.0021 standard error, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for rule of law?
- Central African Republic ranks 20th and Congo ranks 22nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.