Cape Verde vs Gambia: Rule of Law

Cape Verde
0.1442 standard error
in 2011
Gambia
0.1443 standard error
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
15th
Gambia rank
13th

Rule of Law over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Gambia
0.10.20.30.40.5199620032011

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.1443 standard error against 0.1442 standard error in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0001 standard error.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 15th and Gambia ranks 13th of 53 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4715 standard error 0.2873 standard error 0.1842 standard error Cape Verde
2000s 0.2113 standard error 0.1879 standard error 0.0234 standard error Cape Verde
2010s 0.1473 standard error 0.1472 standard error 0 standard error Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Cape Verde or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.1443 standard error against 0.1442 standard error in Cape Verde as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Cape Verde and Gambia?
0.0001 standard error, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Gambia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Cape Verde and Gambia rank globally for rule of law?
Cape Verde ranks 15th and Gambia ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.