Burundi vs Eswatini: Rule of Law

Burundi
0.1447 standard error
in 2011
Eswatini
0.1443 standard error
in 2011
Burundi rank
12th
Eswatini rank
14th

Rule of Law over time

  • Burundi
  • Eswatini
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.1447 standard error against 0.1443 standard error in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0004 standard error.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Burundi ranks 12th and Eswatini ranks 14th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3067 standard error 0.3067 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.2036 standard error 0.2038 standard error 0.0002 standard error Eswatini
2010s 0.1477 standard error 0.1476 standard error 0.0001 standard error Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Burundi or Eswatini?
Burundi, at 0.1447 standard error against 0.1443 standard error in Eswatini as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Burundi and Eswatini?
0.0004 standard error, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Eswatini?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Burundi and Eswatini rank globally for rule of law?
Burundi ranks 12th and Eswatini ranks 14th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.