Botswana vs Ethiopia: Rule of Law

Botswana
0.1309 standard error
in 2011
Ethiopia
0.13 standard error
in 2011
Botswana rank
37th
Ethiopia rank
38th

Rule of Law over time

  • Botswana
  • Ethiopia
00.050.10.150.2199620032011

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.1309 standard error against 0.13 standard error in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.0009 standard error.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Botswana ranks 37th and Ethiopia ranks 38th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2099 standard error 0.2099 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.155 standard error 0.158 standard error 0.003 standard error Ethiopia
2010s 0.1336 standard error 0.133 standard error 0.0005 standard error Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Botswana or Ethiopia?
Botswana, at 0.1309 standard error against 0.13 standard error in Ethiopia as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Botswana and Ethiopia?
0.0009 standard error, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ethiopia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Botswana and Ethiopia rank globally for rule of law?
Botswana ranks 37th and Ethiopia ranks 38th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.