Angola vs Madagascar: Rule of Law

Angola
0.13 standard error
in 2011
Madagascar
0.129 standard error
in 2011
Angola rank
38th
Madagascar rank
41st

Rule of Law over time

  • Angola
  • Madagascar
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Madagascar, a difference of 0.001 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.

Angola ranks 38th and Madagascar ranks 41st of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2099 standard error 0.2873 standard error 0.0774 standard error Madagascar
2000s 0.1695 standard error 0.1768 standard error 0.0073 standard error Madagascar
2010s 0.133 standard error 0.1319 standard error 0.0011 standard error Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Angola or Madagascar?
Angola, at 0.13 standard error against 0.129 standard error in Madagascar as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Angola and Madagascar?
0.001 standard error, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Madagascar?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Angola and Madagascar rank globally for rule of law?
Angola ranks 38th and Madagascar ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.