Algeria vs Botswana: Rule of Law

Algeria
0.1311 standard error
in 2011
Botswana
0.1309 standard error
in 2011
Algeria rank
34th
Botswana rank
37th

Rule of Law over time

  • Algeria
  • Botswana
00.050.10.150.2199620032011

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 0.1311 standard error against 0.1309 standard error in Botswana, a difference of 0.0002 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Botswana ahead.

Algeria ranks 34th and Botswana ranks 37th of 53 countries.

Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2099 standard error 0.2099 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.1593 standard error 0.155 standard error 0.0043 standard error Algeria
2010s 0.1341 standard error 0.1336 standard error 0.0006 standard error Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law, Algeria or Botswana?
Algeria, at 0.1311 standard error against 0.1309 standard error in Botswana as of 2011.
What is the difference in rule of law between Algeria and Botswana?
0.0002 standard error, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Botswana?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Algeria and Botswana rank globally for rule of law?
Algeria ranks 34th and Botswana ranks 37th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.