Malta vs Sweden: Rule of Law Index

Malta
0.83
in 2025
Sweden
0.989
in 2025
Malta rank
3rd
Sweden rank
5th

Rule of Law Index over time

  • Malta
  • Sweden
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.989 against 0.83 in Malta, a difference of 0.159.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 3rd and Sweden ranks 5th of 3 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sweden Difference Ahead
1900s 0.747 0.985 0.238 Sweden
1910s 0.747 0.9851 0.2381 Sweden
1920s 0.747 0.9868 0.2398 Sweden
1930s 0.747 0.9876 0.2406 Sweden
1940s 0.747 0.988 0.241 Sweden
1950s 0.747 0.991 0.244 Sweden
1960s 0.7402 0.9929 0.2527 Sweden
1970s 0.723 0.994 0.271 Sweden
1980s 0.7516 0.9948 0.2432 Sweden
1990s 0.846 0.995 0.149 Sweden
2000s 0.8452 0.9946 0.1494 Sweden
2010s 0.8077 0.9937 0.186 Sweden
2020s 0.8268 0.9912 0.1643 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law index, Malta or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.989 against 0.83 in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in rule of law index between Malta and Sweden?
0.159, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sweden?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Malta and Sweden rank globally for rule of law index?
Malta ranks 3rd and Sweden ranks 5th of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rule of Law Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,303 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.