Jordan vs Mauritius: Rule of Law Index

Jordan
0.774
in 2025
Mauritius
0.792
in 2025
Jordan rank
53rd
Mauritius rank
50th

Rule of Law Index over time

  • Jordan
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.792 against 0.774 in Jordan, a difference of 0.018.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Mauritius ahead.

Jordan ranks 53rd and Mauritius ranks 50th of 173 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Mauritius Difference Ahead
1920s 0.5974 0.738 0.1406 Mauritius
1930s 0.6031 0.7386 0.1355 Mauritius
1940s 0.6074 0.759 0.1516 Mauritius
1950s 0.6125 0.8346 0.2221 Mauritius
1960s 0.5984 0.8277 0.2293 Mauritius
1970s 0.5744 0.7506 0.1762 Mauritius
1980s 0.608 0.761 0.153 Mauritius
1990s 0.6124 0.7769 0.1645 Mauritius
2000s 0.5795 0.801 0.2215 Mauritius
2010s 0.6134 0.76 0.1466 Mauritius
2020s 0.7177 0.6438 0.0738 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law index, Jordan or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.792 against 0.774 in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in rule of law index between Jordan and Mauritius?
0.018, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritius?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Mauritius rank globally for rule of law index?
Jordan ranks 53rd and Mauritius ranks 50th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rule of Law Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,303 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.