Comoros vs Sudan: Rule of Law Index

Comoros
0.175
in 2025
Sudan
0.174
in 2025
Comoros rank
141st
Sudan rank
142nd

Rule of Law Index over time

  • Comoros
  • Sudan
00.20.40.6182119232025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.175 against 0.174 in Sudan, a difference of 0.001.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 141st and Sudan ranks 142nd of 173 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 9 and Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Sudan Difference Ahead
1900s 0.6448 0.605 0.0398 Comoros
1910s 0.6538 0.605 0.0488 Comoros
1940s 0.618 0.612 0.006 Comoros
1950s 0.6256 0.5959 0.0297 Comoros
1960s 0.6044 0.5214 0.083 Comoros
1970s 0.534 0.3512 0.1828 Comoros
1980s 0.2727 0.3733 0.1006 Sudan
1990s 0.2805 0.046 0.2345 Comoros
2000s 0.3038 0.0858 0.218 Comoros
2010s 0.2877 0.1104 0.1773 Comoros
2020s 0.1672 0.1765 0.0093 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law index, Comoros or Sudan?
Comoros, at 0.175 against 0.174 in Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in rule of law index between Comoros and Sudan?
0.001, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Sudan?
94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Sudan rank globally for rule of law index?
Comoros ranks 141st and Sudan ranks 142nd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rule of Law Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,303 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.