Nauru vs Saudi Arabia: Rule of Law - Governance score
Rule of Law - Governance score over time
- Nauru
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 61.3 0-100 against 60.59 0-100 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.71 0-100.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 83rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 86th of 206 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.33 0-100 | 59.01 0-100 | 13.32 0-100 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 74.52 0-100 | 53.92 0-100 | 20.6 0-100 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 68.36 0-100 | 52.9 0-100 | 15.47 0-100 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 61.69 0-100 | 57.04 0-100 | 4.65 0-100 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance score, Nauru or Saudi Arabia?
- Nauru, at 61.3 0-100 against 60.59 0-100 in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance score between Nauru and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.71 0-100, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Saudi Arabia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Saudi Arabia rank globally for rule of law - governance score?
- Nauru ranks 83rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 86th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).